The issue of whether courts in EPO member states have authority to grant preliminary injunctions on the basis of pending patent applications has recently been litigated in a number of European countries (see previous mentions on this blog here, here, here, and here). Marco Stief has now published two papers, one in German and one in English, on the topic, noting that such injunctions appear to be permissible in some countries, albeit in several of them only in exceptional cases. His more recent contribution is Fingolimod—(no) injunction before patent grant, J. Intell. Prop. L. & Prac. __ (forthcoming 2024). Here is the abstract:The corresponding German article is (Keine) Unterlassungsverfügung: Zugleich Besprechung von LG Düsseldorf „Fingolimod‟ unter Berücksichtigung von Parallel-Verfahren in anderen Jurisdiktionen, ("No Preliminary Injunction: As Well as Case Law from the Düsseldorf Regional Court in "Fingolimod" in Consideration of Parallel Proceedings in Other Jurisdictions"), 23/2023 GRUR 1651-60.
For a different point of view, see Matthieu Dhenne’s article Preliminary Injunctions Based on a Patent Application: A Justified Solution? (Fingolimod Case), 45 EIPR 236 (2023), previously noted here, and his more recent post FINGOLIMOD or the Hesitation Blues: can preliminary injunctions be based on a patent application under French law?, Kluwer Patent Blog, Dec. 19, 2023, which updates the French case law discussed in his earlier article and in the two Stief articles.
This article analyses the position of European courts on the availability of preliminary injunctions on the basis of a patent application, reviewing several national decisions in the fingolimod litigation. The decisions handed down by the Düsseldorf Regional Court, the Tribunal Judiciaire de Paris, the Danish Maritime and Commercial Court, the District Court of The Hague and the Barcelona Commercial Court show that the courts, with limited exceptions, reject provisional legal protection on the basis of a mere patent application on the grounds of absence of legal certainty. The analysis identifies four (minimum) prerequisites that must be fulfilled for the courts to consider the possibility of issuing an injunction before a patent is granted.
For a different point of view, see Matthieu Dhenne’s article Preliminary Injunctions Based on a Patent Application: A Justified Solution? (Fingolimod Case), 45 EIPR 236 (2023), previously noted here, and his more recent post FINGOLIMOD or the Hesitation Blues: can preliminary injunctions be based on a patent application under French law?, Kluwer Patent Blog, Dec. 19, 2023, which updates the French case law discussed in his earlier article and in the two Stief articles.
No comments:
Post a Comment