Here is one that I hadn't seen before, though it bears a date of December 16, 2015: by MyKey Technology, Inc. in support of neither party. This amicus brief (which appears to be filed in connection with Halo only, and not the companion case Stryker; not sure why) argues that the Supreme Court should read U.S. Patent Act section 284 as not requiring a showing of willfulness as a precondition to an award of enhanced damages; that such awards should be committed to the district court's discretion; and that they may serve both compensatory and punitive purposes.
For links to the other amicus briefs that I am aware of as having been filed so far, see here. Patently-O also published a post on the amicus briefs shortly before Christmas. I shall endeavor to keep readers abreast of the remaining briefs when they come in. According to Scotus Blog, oral argument in the two cases is set for February 23.
No comments:
Post a Comment