CPI Antitrust Chronicle Issues on Patents and Antitrust

As reported by Professor Danny Sokol on the Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog (here and here), CPI Antitrust Chronicle has now published a two-issue symposium that Professor Sokol organized on "Antitrust and Patent Issues."  Here is a link to the journal's website, from which the individual articles can be accessed.  The articles in issue 1 include the following:

1. Alden Abbott, Standard Setting, Patents, and Competition Law Enforcement—The Need for U.S. Policy Reform.

2. Stuart Chemtob, Carte Blanche for SSOs? The Antitrust Division’s Business Review Letter on the IEEE’s Patent Policy Update.

3. Sean Gates, Defining “Reasonable” in RAND: A Bit of Common Sense.

4. Joseph Kattan, The Next FRAND Battle: Why the Royalty Base Matters.

5. Richard Stark, The Royalty Stacking Supposition

6. Dina Kallay, F/RANDly Judicial Advice to the Rescue: Ericsson v. D-Link

7. Anne Layne-Farrar & Koren Wong-Ervin, An Analysis of the Federal Circuit’s Decision in Ericsson v. D-Link.

8. Yoonhee Kim & Hui Jin Yang, A Brief Overview of Qualcomm v. Korea Fair Trade Commission.

Issue 2 includes the following:

1.  Jorge Contreras, Standards, Royalty Stacking, and Collective Action

2. James Rill & James Kress, The Application of China’s Anti-Monopoly Law to Essential Patent Licensing: The NDRC/QUALCOMM Action

3. Michael Lindsay & Konstantinos Konstantinos, Updating a Patent Policy: The IEEE Experience

4. Hugh Hollman, IEEE Business Review Letter: The DOJ Reveals Its Hand

5.  Roy Hoffinger, The 2015 DOJ IEEE Business Review Letter: The Triumph of Industrial Policy Preferences Over Law and Evidence  (Roy, tell us what you really think!)

6.  John Harkrider, Original Sin (Does not appear to be a theological treatise)

7.  Jay Jurata & Adya Baker, Apples and Oranges: Comparing Assertions of SEPs and Differentiating Patents from an Antitrust Perspective