Kimble v. Marvel: Respondent's Brief and Additional Amicus Briefs

I've blogged about this case, in which the U.S. Supreme Court will decide whether or not to overturn the 1964 case of Brulotte v. Thys (which renders unenforceable a contract to pay postexpiration patent royalties) several times before, including here, here and here.  Most recently I posted (here) the petitioner's brief and several amicus briefs that were filed a few weeks ago (including one in which I joined).  Now that they are available, readers may also wish to take a look at the respondent's brief, here, and the following amicus briefs supporting Brulotte's retention:

1.  The Solicitor General's brief on behalf of the United States

2.  Brief of Nautilus, Inc.

3.  Brief of Public Knowledge

4.  Brief of Washington Legal Foundation

5.  Brief of William Mitchell College of Law Intellectual Property Institute