tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5202549570150301909.post4890972936274686393..comments2024-03-15T00:21:23.406-07:00Comments on Comparative Patent Remedies : EWHC Awards £13.4 Million in Patent DamagesThomas Cotterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07145440504421320263noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5202549570150301909.post-69101014219567214552022-11-14T08:16:28.317-08:002022-11-14T08:16:28.317-08:00The opinion doesn't mention United Horse-Shoe....The opinion doesn't mention United Horse-Shoe. As with the Anan Kasei case earlier this year, see http://comparativepatentremedies.blogspot.com/2022/04/anan-kasei-v-neo-important-patent.html, I suspect that the English courts have begun to recognize that United Horse-Shoe is inconsistent with general damages law, and will continue to apply it only in cases directly on point, until such time as the UKSC overrules it.Thomas Cotterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07145440504421320263noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5202549570150301909.post-20246472036134564212022-11-11T05:14:12.257-08:002022-11-11T05:14:12.257-08:00How does the discussion of 'the counter-factua...How does the discussion of 'the counter-factual' square with United Horseshoe? (I haven't read the case.)Normanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17573687140337856397noreply@blogger.com