tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5202549570150301909.comments2024-03-15T00:21:23.406-07:00 Comparative Patent Remedies Thomas Cotterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07145440504421320263noreply@blogger.comBlogger250125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5202549570150301909.post-38005430830409015072024-01-04T07:12:02.936-08:002024-01-04T07:12:02.936-08:00Thank you!Thank you!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5202549570150301909.post-11809966605753424312023-12-27T23:03:04.295-08:002023-12-27T23:03:04.295-08:00This is very good information regarding Patent Dam...This is very good information regarding Patent Damages.<br /><a href="https://www.ataraxiaip.com/patent" rel="nofollow"> patent consultant in DelhiAtaraxia IPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14353116925246664707noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5202549570150301909.post-46509237003061726302023-11-30T13:28:06.280-08:002023-11-30T13:28:06.280-08:00Regarding the French case and your question on Lil...Regarding the French case and your question on Lilly to be considered as some sort of licensee : there cannot be implied license under French law. The patent license has to be evidenced in writing, failing which it shall be null and void (art L613-8 IP Code last sentence).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5202549570150301909.post-89039622010458322952023-06-16T01:57:29.170-07:002023-06-16T01:57:29.170-07:00"This post is a fantastic mix of analysis and..."This post is a fantastic mix of analysis and practical advice - an excellent read for anyone wanting to learn more about the subject!" <br /><br /><a href="https://srmuniversity.ac.in/department/department-of-law" rel="nofollow"> Top Law College in North India</a>Suraj Mahorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12302057668256733849noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5202549570150301909.post-48267168422983553762023-05-28T03:44:19.829-07:002023-05-28T03:44:19.829-07:00Nice post thank you AdrianaNice post thank you AdrianaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5202549570150301909.post-7683481420834269162023-02-27T23:09:51.068-08:002023-02-27T23:09:51.068-08:00I wanted to thank you for this great read!! I defi...I wanted to thank you for this great read!! I definitely enjoying every little bit of it I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you post.<br /><br /><a href="https://manylink.co/@sameinlein" rel="nofollow">Trademark Services Delhi</a>Ataraxia IPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14353116925246664707noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5202549570150301909.post-34258622505531363142023-01-23T05:48:20.534-08:002023-01-23T05:48:20.534-08:00Very nice and informative content. Looking forward...Very nice and informative content. Looking forward to read more from blogIP Punchhttp://www.ippunch.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5202549570150301909.post-69101014219567214552022-11-14T08:16:28.317-08:002022-11-14T08:16:28.317-08:00The opinion doesn't mention United Horse-Shoe....The opinion doesn't mention United Horse-Shoe. As with the Anan Kasei case earlier this year, see http://comparativepatentremedies.blogspot.com/2022/04/anan-kasei-v-neo-important-patent.html, I suspect that the English courts have begun to recognize that United Horse-Shoe is inconsistent with general damages law, and will continue to apply it only in cases directly on point, until such time as the UKSC overrules it.Thomas Cotterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07145440504421320263noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5202549570150301909.post-20246472036134564212022-11-11T05:14:12.257-08:002022-11-11T05:14:12.257-08:00How does the discussion of 'the counter-factua...How does the discussion of 'the counter-factual' square with United Horseshoe? (I haven't read the case.)Normanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17573687140337856397noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5202549570150301909.post-58168469592310513062022-02-08T08:59:00.844-08:002022-02-08T08:59:00.844-08:00Your concluding comment that a third trial seems w...Your concluding comment that a third trial seems wasteful is quite true. Expensive for litigants, judicial system, and jury members. But it sounds to me that the plaintiff here twice convinced a jury of substantial damages, presumably over Apple's vigorous defense pointing out the flaws in plaintiff's position. Most efficient policy in my mind would be to let the jury weigh the competing evidence from both parties, and stick with the outcome unless there was egregious misbehavior. Thank you for all your work on the fantastic blog!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5202549570150301909.post-25906083242609375722021-10-25T00:38:40.669-07:002021-10-25T00:38:40.669-07:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5202549570150301909.post-54547539912273442332021-08-27T14:05:28.117-07:002021-08-27T14:05:28.117-07:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5202549570150301909.post-68741596071814250592021-07-21T22:45:01.447-07:002021-07-21T22:45:01.447-07:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Brayden Danielhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08913385603540427261noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5202549570150301909.post-13172317503673285752021-07-19T15:25:13.003-07:002021-07-19T15:25:13.003-07:00I don't think so. I'm responding to the ar...I don't think so. I'm responding to the argument that in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries courts often assumed that there was no adequate remedy at law for infringement extending out into the future--because often there wasn't. Courts didn't award future lost profits. They sometimes did award an established royalty that extended to the end of the patent term, however, in which case there was an adequate remedy at law and no reason for an injunction, if I'm understanding the history correctly. But established royalties have always been hard to prove. The third option of awarding a reasonable royalty, even for past infringement alone, wasn't firmly established until the 1910s. So a law court often could award only nominal damages, which is not an adequate remedy.<br />Now that reasonable royalties are a thing, however, it isn't so weird to think of awarding a reasonable royalty for both past and future infringement in some cases, as was once the case for established royalties. It may not have been common to think of it that way until recent years, but so what? The point is that the background assumption against which courts may have assumed there was "no adequate remedy at law" no longer holds. Thomas Cotterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07145440504421320263noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5202549570150301909.post-81090278251207875512021-07-19T15:13:14.189-07:002021-07-19T15:13:14.189-07:00Hi Tom -
On your last point, aren't you putti...Hi Tom -<br /><br />On your last point, aren't you putting the cart before the horse? Because ongoing royalties are available, maybe we don't do injunctions....but that was not the norm. Ongoing royalties are a newish thing, created because courts don't give injunctions. So, I can see one making the argument that if you can get ongoing royalties maybe equity doesn't call for an injunction, but I think the history pretty clearly shows (even post 1910) that it was equity (and injunction) first and only now that this is not the case do we consider whether maybe ongoing royalties are good enough.Michael Rischhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00878815952765507347noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5202549570150301909.post-53301239252559382552021-07-10T12:09:31.725-07:002021-07-10T12:09:31.725-07:00Congratulations on your new role!Congratulations on your new role!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09320944343235098993noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5202549570150301909.post-11983667573432136592021-07-09T03:32:33.606-07:002021-07-09T03:32:33.606-07:00Good and much useful article.
Patent registration...Good and much useful article.<br /><br /><a href="https://vakilsearch.com/permanent-patent" rel="nofollow">Patent registration</a>harishhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16676718765009667847noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5202549570150301909.post-12869368770569196152021-06-21T03:33:50.395-07:002021-06-21T03:33:50.395-07:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.GREENLIGHT FINANCIAL SERVICEShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08535775328503640615noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5202549570150301909.post-83796008789381782482021-03-29T00:15:19.887-07:002021-03-29T00:15:19.887-07:00Amazing articleAmazing articleab harryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05348793385368941451noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5202549570150301909.post-64268104128850255582021-03-01T22:42:10.872-08:002021-03-01T22:42:10.872-08:00Dear Prof. Cotter, I present at 1:00 at the Sympos...Dear Prof. Cotter, I present at 1:00 at the Symposium. I am planning to hang around in cyberspace to hear your presentation. I am tremendously interested in modern economic analyses of our well-worn legal approaches. Many thanks for what I know will be an engrossing analysis. I guest lecture in Minneapolis, at St. Thomas. To purchase my book (singular), here is link: https://www.americanbar.org/products/inv/book/379525638/. It is a gripping read about administrative law practice, I promise! See you on Zoom. Best, Lisa Miller <br /> Prof. Lisa Miller, Esq.https://www.blogger.com/profile/07627802517405745487noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5202549570150301909.post-35424445175415704742021-02-28T04:11:47.270-08:002021-02-28T04:11:47.270-08:00This comment has been removed by the author.SK Enterpriseshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08143542035823516860noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5202549570150301909.post-13888650315099979892021-02-25T10:07:07.953-08:002021-02-25T10:07:07.953-08:00Here's a link to the comment https://www.regul...Here's a link to the comment https://www.regulations.gov/comment/PTO-P-2020-0057-0096Turoskihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14804206330424849797noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5202549570150301909.post-57070098152789308352021-02-25T08:44:24.244-08:002021-02-25T08:44:24.244-08:00Hi Ken. Okakita's paper is in English. Some ...Hi Ken. Okakita's paper is in English. Some of the materials he cites are only in Japanese, though.<br />Thomas Cotterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07145440504421320263noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5202549570150301909.post-47327564270818841712021-02-15T14:16:55.160-08:002021-02-15T14:16:55.160-08:00Tom : is the full paper available in English ? Ken...Tom : is the full paper available in English ? Ken AdamoKen Adamohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09261221071639525242noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5202549570150301909.post-9558051346897015472020-07-14T00:46:48.111-07:002020-07-14T00:46:48.111-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.lakeyardshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10788883408913462290noreply@blogger.com